RESOURCES « Deep Packet Inspection

RESOURCES

Angela Daly. (2010). “The Legality of Deep Packet Inspection,” presented at the First Interdisciplinary Workshop on Communications Policy and Regulation ‘Communications and Competition Law and Policy – Challenges of the New Decade’ (2010).
Macia-Fernandez, Gabriel, Yang Wang, Rafael Rodriguez, and Aleksander Kuzmanovic. (2010). “ISP-Enabled Behavioral Ad Targeting without Deep Packet Inspection,” in proceedings of IEEE Infocom 2010 (March 2010).
Bendrath, Ralf. (2009). “Global technology trends and national regulation: Explaining Variance in the Governance of Deep Packet Inspection,” presented at the International Studies Annual Convention (February 2009).
Parsons, Christopher. (2009). “(Working Paper) Deep Packet Inspection in Perspective: Tracing its lineage and surveillance potentials,” New Transparency Project.
Sandoval, Catherine J. K. (2009). “Disclosure, Deception and Deep-Packet Inspection: The Role of the Federal Trade Commission Act’s Deceptive Conduct Prohibitions in the Net Neutrality Debate,” Fordham Law Review, Vol. 78, p, 641, 2009.
Ohm, Paul. (2008). “The Rise and Fall of ISP Surveillance,” U of Colorado Research Paper No. 08-22

“Deep packet inspection engine goes open source” by Nate Anderson (September 9, 2009).
“Forester: Enabling Deep Packet Inspection As An Enabling Technology” by Chenxi Wang (June 4, 2009).
“Deep Packet Inspection: What you need to know” by Michael Kassner (November 22, 2008).
“Privacy, piracy, and deep packet inspection” by Carol Wilson (October 29, 2007).
“Deep packet inspection meets ‘Net neutrality, CALEA” by Nate Anderson (July 26, 2007).

[d]Packet.org - a San Francisco Bay Area based nonprofit corporation founded for education and scientific purposes to foster and support community interest and progress in deep packet inspection. It’s mission is to be the premier global resource for information and collaboration on DPI related topics.
Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) on deep packet inspection – EPIC is a public interest research center in Washington, D.C. It was established in 1994 to focus public attention on emerging civil liberties issues and to protect privacy, the First Amendment, and constitutional values.
ipoque resources – a German deep packet inspection vendor that predominantly services Europe and parts of Africa, the company has publicly noted relationships between DPI, privacy, copyright and traffic management issues in their white papers and other resource documents. ipoque has also released an open source version of their DPI engine at OpenDPI.org
NoDPI – a UK based anti-deep packet inspection group that is predominantly concerned with the privacy consideration of DPI.
Arbor Networks – an American DPI vendor who provides substantial information to the public about their products. [REGISTRATION REQUIRED]

Deep Packet Inspection website by the Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada
Assistant Commissioner recommends Bell Canada inform customers about Deep Packet Inspection by the Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada
Traffic Management Hearings website by the Canadian Radio Television and Telecommunications Commission